| |
We are all judges and jurors in the Court of public opinion, so to
speak, but only one side of the case gets stated in Western media and
in Western education systems, on Sex War issues. Because of the lack
of organized Masculist resistance, Feminists are allowed to get away
with all kinds of sophistry.
- Feminists are allowed to plead both sides of an argument in different
contexts. They have acquired a Women's Room at Victoria University
of Wellington (New Zealand), so that women can breast-feed in private
-- but one Male Feminist journalist on Radio New Zealand thought it
was so obvious that a female Parliamentarian in Australia should be
allowed to breast-feed her baby in Parliament's Debating Chamber that
he didn't even bother to hide his prejudice from listeners ! The point
is that some men might be embarrassed by bare breasts in public, and
some men might not -- but it is not up to women to decide by
themselves that they need privacy for breast-feeding in one
context, but that they should be allowed to breast-feed in public
in another context !
- One Law School tutor made a cynical aside to the females in her
tutorial about how, in Tort law, pregnant women were not regarded
as fully mentally competent. She backed her criticism up by saying
that pregnant women were obviously competent to hold down jobs. I
pointed out that she could not possibly use the fact that that pregnant
women held down jobs in New Zealand as evidence that pregnant women
were mentally competent, because it was illegal
under Human Rights legislation for an employer
to discriminate against pregnant women ! There could be any number
of mentally incompetent pregnant women holding down jobs, because
the Feminists had got a law passed that made them declared competent
!
- In a Parliamentary Select Committee hearing,
I mentioned some research that I had come across that showed that
pregnant women in fact do not function as well mentally as when they
are not pregnant. I was challenged on this point by Labour MP Lianne
Dalziell (currently Minister of Immigration and Associate Minister
of Justice), so I offered to send her the precise reference. She then
said she didn't want to have the reference to the research article
! In other words, she was simply not interested in research results
that contradicted her Feminist ideology.
|
